| Dear Mr. Premack: My husband
drew up a will 3 years prior to our marriage. In it, he has his two
adult daughters as heirs to his company. My name is not mentioned at all
because we had not even met at that time. He never has updated the will.
In the event of his death, will I receive half of his company even
though his will was drawn prior to our union? –A.C. The answer to your
question lies in understanding how Texas law defines community property,
and in how Texas law handles assets when a person dies. Under our
marital property system, an item that was owned by a person before
marriage was and remains that person’s separate property. On the other
hand, growth in the value of separate property, when that growth is
directly attributed to the owner’s personal efforts, is community
property. Additionally, any income stream derived from the separate
property is community property.
Under our probate system, a Will allows its maker to dispose of
anything its maker owns. A person owns half of any community property
assets and owns all of his or her own separate property. The Will’s
maker cannot dispose of something he/she does not own except under
extraordinary circumstances.
Your husband’s company was entirely his separate property on the day
you married. But when he went back to work, his efforts to improve the
company belonged to the community. If he dies, and if you can establish
that the company’s inherent value increased due to his personal efforts
after the marriage date, then you own half of that increase.
If his Will leaves "all of his estate" or "the entire company" to his
adult daughters, they receive his half of the community property and all
his separate property interest in the company. If any part of the
company can be identified as community property, you retain the half you
already own. This may be an accounting and legal quagmire, and may lead
to litigation over just what part of the company’s value is community
property and what part is separate property. To avoid that struggle, he
should visit with an estate-planning attorney to clarify his position,
prepare appropriate legal documents, and hopefully eliminate a nasty
battle.
Dear Mr. Premack: I own a Cadillac I no longer drive because of my
failing eyesight. Sometimes my son chauffeurs me, but he has had
accidents in the past. I am worried about liability. What can I do under
these circumstances? – V.H.
You have stopped driving because safety is the biggest issue. Your
son’s driving record also creates a safety issue and thus potential
liability for you. You are aware he has had accidents yet still allow
him to drive a vehicle you own. If he causes another accident, the
injured party is likely to sue him as driver and to sue you as vehicle
owner.
One possible solution is to buy an excess of auto liability insurance
and make sure your son is listed as an authorized driver on the vehicle.
That won’t stop you from being sued if there is an accident, but the
insurance will hopefully cover the damages.
You could also transfer ownership of the vehicle to your son. The
legislature just passed a change to the tax on transferring a used car:
effective October 1, 2006 tax will be charged based on the sale price or
on 80% of the blue book value, whichever is higher. This is a large tax
increase, intended to offset reductions to real property taxes that will
phase in over the next two years. If you decide to take this route and
if you act soon, you can transfer title before the tax increase hits. |