| Dear Mr. Premack: I have
five children, two of whom are sons. I named one son as Executor in my
Will, and my husband named the other son as Executor in his Will. I
think that making them Coexecutors would create a problem where each
thing has to be done by both people. What are the pitfalls of naming
Coexecutors? – MH Right now, your Wills name individual Executors who
are different people. If you die first, the son you have named will
handle your estate alone. If your husband dies first, the son that he
selected will handle his estate alone. If you both die at the same time,
there will be two probates, each being handled by the different sons you
selected – not as Coexecutors, but each individually having
responsibility for the half community property interest owned by you and
owned by your husband respectively.
You could abandon that setup and decide to name Coexecutors (two
people who are both in charge of each estate at the same time). If so,
they would both be able to handle the entirety of both estates. However,
naming Coexecutors can provide an opening for conflict, because
Coexecutors are not bound by law to act unanimously.
What if funds are limited, and one Coexecutor feels it is appropriate
to pay off the MasterCard while the other one wants to use the money to
pay off the Visa? They might argue over money and how it should be
allocated. Both Coexecutors could even hire separate attorneys which
would double the cost of administration.
Coexecutors must act jointly only when dealing with the sale of land.
But if the Coexecutors are like-minded they can choose to coordinate all
of their efforts. Conflict is not a given just because you name
Coexecutors. When they get along and work together, Coexecutors share
the burden and lighten each other’s load. So it depends on the character
of the people and their relationship whether naming Coexecutors is a
wise or an unwise tactic.
Dear Mr. Premack: An elderly woman grants legal Durable Power of
Attorney to her son. She later signs a Gift Deed with Life Estate clause
transferring title of real estate upon her death to the same son. Is the
Gift Deed legal since it was (a) signed only by her and not by her Power
of Attorney, and (b) gifted to the person who is also agent in her Power
of Attorney? I was told that either event makes the Gift Deed invalid. –
PJS
When anyone signs a Durable Power of Attorney as principal, that
person retains full and unrestricted right to handle any and all
business and financial matters for herself. The agent may act on behalf
of the principal, but does not supplant the principal.
The agent is a fiduciary for the principal, so the first question the
agent must ask before taking any action is "am I authorized by the power
of attorney to do this action?" and the second questions is "does this
benefit the principal?" The agent cannot legally act beyond the scope of
his authorization, and he cannot legally act in a way that harms the
principal.
In your letter, you say that the elder woman signed the gift deed
herself. It was her choice, her signature and her act. Her son, although
he is agent, was not taking part in the transaction except as recipient
of the property upon his mother’s death. There is nothing about the deed
that violates a fiduciary duty, because the elderly woman is acting on
her own, not through her agent. Thus under Texas law this transaction is
entirely valid. |