| Dear Mr. Premack: My wife
needed minor surgery and was scheduled into an outpatient ambulatory
surgical facility for the procedure. Upon arriving, she was given
paperwork including a "Waiver of Advanced Health Care Directive". She
had not been advised of this waiver beforehand, and was told to sign or
to forego the procedure. When we asked for explanation, they said this
is a federally imposed requirement on outpatient surgical facilities.
The Waiver said (among other things) "I hereby waive any advanced health
care directive I may have given any other person or entity, including,
without limitations, any order not to resuscitate me". Is there such a
law? Doesn’t this interfere with individual choice? – KB Requiring a
patient to waive legal rights in order to obtain necessary health care
certainly interferes with individual choice. Despite what they told you,
there is not a federal law that requires such a waiver. Instead, they
are covered by the federal law requiring medical facilities to accept
any advance directive a patient has made pursuant to that state’s law.
They are required by federal law to be capable of providing
resuscitative services, but if the patient refuses those services they
must accept the choice.
For instance, Texas law allows anyone to execute an "out of hospital
do not resuscitate order". The law clearly requires outpatient hospitals
to honor a patient’s advance choice to avoid resuscitation. This
facility’s Waiver requirement violates both state and federal law, and
you should consider filing a complaint with the Texas Department of
State Health Services, which oversees licensing of these facilities.
Dear Mr. Premack: My CPA told me that it is legal to gift $11,000
every year to each of my children. I don’t have that kind of money, but
know people who do. But reading in your column about Medicaid’s transfer
penalties, I wonder if the gift law has been overturned. I’m sure that
would affect a lot of innocent people who never meant to do anything
fraudulent. – R.N.
There is a distinct difference between the gift tax laws and the
Medicaid laws. The Medicaid transfer penalties do not overturn the gift
tax exemption; rather, they are a factor that must be considered when
deciding whether to make a gift at all.
If you have some money and decide to give it away, you have to ponder
the effects that gift may have on you. Will you have enough money left
to pay for your continuing needs? Will you owe any taxes because of the
gift? Will the gift have a negative impact if you need Medicaid
assistance in the future?
Assume you decide giving $20,000 to your son is affordable. As of
1/1/06 the first $12,000 is free of gift tax (it went up from $11,000).
You can pay gift tax on the excess $8,000 or you can use part of your
lifetime million-dollar credit to eliminate the gift tax, which is the
choice most people would make. So gift tax is not a big consideration.
On the other hand, if you require assistance from Medicaid in the
future, a $12,000 gift will cause them to deny coverage for 102 days.
This is assuming that (a) less than 5 years have passed since the gift
was given, and that (b) Congress imposes the new more restrictive law
they are expected to vote on later this month. Hence, the Medicaid
consequences can be a bigger consideration than the gift tax
consequences.
|