| Many Seniors in the San Antonio
area have been contacting me since the new Medicaid "estate recovery"
law went into effect in September, 2003. I wrote a column then
discussing the background of the new law, concluding that the process of
developing regulations would likely take until the spring of 2004. (click
here to read it) The next step is upon us. The Texas Health and
Human Services Commission has released a framework for establishing
estate recovery policy. It announced a series of public hearings, the
first of which will be in San Antonio on Monday, February 9, 2004 from 4
to 7 pm, at the Texas Diabetes Institute Auditorium, 701 S. Zarzamora.
Other hearings will be held in Harlingen, Houston, Ft. Worth, Lubbock
and El Paso. The times and places are posted on the HHSC website (link
to them by
clicking here).
Federal law requires states to develop programs to recover costs for
Medicaid coverage in nursing homes, through community-based services,
and for hospital and prescription drug services provided to patients 55
and older, upon the death of the patient. Texas resisted implementing
such a program for ten years, until the 2003 legislative session.
Since then, a government workgroup has been studying the legal
parameters of estate recovery. They note that all the states that
already have recovery programs have implemented them in different
manners. Federal law mandates a few important protections, and state law
also limits how far the Texas estate recovery program can reach. HHSC
will be adhering to these restrictions:
1. There will be no recovery effort if the patient leaves a surviving
spouse, a child under the age of 21, a permanently disabled child or an
unmarried child of any age living in the home;
2. There will be an "undue hardship" exemption;
3. There will be no estate recovery in situations where it would not
be cost-effective; and
4. Any claims for recovery will take place through the probate
process, with Medicaid claims taking a back seat to funeral expenses,
secured claims, mortgages, child support, and taxes.
That framework leaves a lot to discuss. For instance, how will the
state define "undue hardship?" (The proposal says that any real estate
that is the family’s primary source of income – like a farm or ranch –
may be exempt.) What criteria will be used to decide if a recovery will
not be cost-effective? Will recovery be imposed on those currently
covered by Medicaid, or just on new Medicaid recipients? Will any
exemptions be allowed? (The proposal says the family will get to keep,
from the sale of their particular home, half the average cost of a home
in that county). How long must an unmarried adult child live in the
home? (The proposal says for at least a year prior to the patient’s
admission to the nursing home).
HHSC’s proposal includes the idea of hiring private firms to conduct
the estate recovery process. The model that comes to mind is the
collection of local property taxes by a law firm contracted through the
government. The tax-collection firms are usually aggressive, being
compensated based on amounts they collect. Do you want Medicaid to
contract its estate recovery effort out to similar operations? You can
express your opinion at the public hearing next Monday. |