| Dear Mr. Premack: My mother is
60 and my father is 67. He has Medicare but she does not. Is she legally
entitled to share his benefits? They are both diabetic and I know that
with Medicare, his supplies have been free with supplements through an
insurance company. Will that apply to her as well as him? Thank You. – CET
Medicare covers medical supplies for diabetes (with some limits) for any
person who is 65 or older. At age 60, your mother does not qualify for
Medicare just because her husband is 67. But she can qualify, even at age
60, if she is disabled (that is, she cannot do any type of work and is
expected to remain disabled for at least a year or to die), or if she has
End Stage Renal Disease (kidney impairment that appears irreversible and
permanent, requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant).
Since you asked about Medicare, what about the bill Congress is
debating? The House Ways and Means Committee released a six-page summary
on November 17. The bill (HB1) was released on November 20. On Saturday,
November 22 (at 5:51 a.m.), with less than 2 days to consider the contents
of the 678 page bill, the House voted in an unusual three-hour roll-call
to approve the bill by a 5 member margin. The Senate is also being pushed
to move rapidly.
AARP endorses the bill, stating that while it is "far from perfect" it
will "provide prescription drug coverage at little cost to those who need
it most: people with low incomes, including those who depend on Social
Security for all or most of their income." Critics of AARP feel its role
as insurance company is displacing its role as advocate for its retired
members.
Families USA opposes the bill, stating it will "disqualify low-income
seniors from receiving much-needed drug subsidies if they have a small
amount of assets. … [the bill] will force low-income seniors to enroll for
drug subsidies in state welfare offices, not in Social Security offices."
The House committee summary tells us the $400 billion plan contains:
1) A discount card for Medicare beneficiaries starting April 2004 that
could save 15% or more per prescription (the discount probably coming out
of your pharmacy’s pocket). It may also provide low-income beneficiaries
$600 of assistance in 2004 and 2005; and
2) A prescription insurance program starting in 2006. Beneficiaries
would pay $35/month to a participating insurance plan, and would pay the
first $275 for prescriptions. The plan would then pay 75% of prescription
costs up to $2,200. There is zero coverage for costs between $2,200 and
$3,600, but for drug expenses beyond $3,600 Medicare would pay 100% for
the poor, and others would pay about $5 per prescription.
Many analysts criticize the proposal as very generous to the drug
manufacturers since it does not impose any cost controls. It specifically
forbids Medicare from negotiating lower prices, and fails to authorize
lower-price purchases from Canadian suppliers. Considering the federal
deficit has never been higher (according to the Congressional Budget
Office, the government spent over $480 billion more than it received from
taxes in fiscal 2003) many believe Congress should slow down to allow the
people to understand and weigh-in on this mammoth health bill. |