| Dear Mr. Premack: About
six months ago my wife and I closed on a new home. I won’t mention the
name of the builder, but I’ll say that the job has turned out to be as
shabby as anything I’ve ever seen. We have trouble with the foundation,
which has made the doors stick and the walls crack. I’ve gone in circles
with the builder, who just keeps doing cosmetic fixes. I never thought my
retirement would be spent arguing over faulty construction of my home. I’m
to the point where I’m planning to sue. Can you give me any pointers? –
M.G. I am not a litigation attorney so I will not venture to give you
specific advice on how to sue your contractor. But I chose your letter so
that the community could be made aware of a new law that the legislature
passed and Governor Perry signed, which takes effect on September 1st,
2003: the Texas Residential Construction Liability Act.
The Act completely changes the way a builder can be held accountable
for construction defects. First, it creates a new government entity: the
Texas Residential Construction Commission. The Governor appoints the nine
members, and is required to select four registered builders, one licensed
professional engineer, one architect or building inspector, and three
at-large members. One consumer law expert has likened this to putting the
foxes in charge of the henhouse, since at least six of the nine members
will be in the building trade.
Second, the Act requires that the homeowner notify the builder, in
writing, of each defect, and must give the builder 30 days to respond. If
the builder fails to respond, or responds inadequately, the homeowner must
submit the dispute to the Commission at the expense of the homeowner,
along with evidence of the defects. Thus, the homeowner should hire an
inspector – since overlooking a hidden defect means that defect is not
part of the claim.
The Commission will then assign a private inspector to look at the
home. There is concern that the inspectors will be biased toward the
builders. After all, each homeowner has only one case to bring – but the
builders may be involved in multiple claims, and an inspector who desires
repeat business will not want to come down too hard on the builder. If the
homeowner disagrees with the recommendation of the inspector, an appeal
can be brought before the Commission. However, there is no right to make a
presentation at the appeal; they simply review the documentation. Again,
be aware the Commission, composed mostly of those in the building trade,
may be biased toward the builder.
Only after appeal to the Commission’s is complete can a homeowner turn
to the courts with a lawsuit. Before September 1st, a homeowner
could sue to recover damages including cost of repairs, out of pocket
expenses like inspector’s fees, attorney’s fees plus mental anguish and
punitive damages. After September 1st, the homeowner is limited
to recovering for "breach of warranty" (which eliminates mental anguish
and punitive damages). The Act also strips the homeowner of the right to
sue the builder under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (our primary
consumer protection law since the 1970’s).
Here is the biggest pointer I can give you: if you have a dispute with
your builder, get to your attorney NOW. If a lawsuit is necessary and
appropriate, file it before the Act limits your recovery rights on
September 1st, 2003.
To read more on the Residential Construction Commission in my column
of August 26, 2003 -- click here. |