| Dear Mr. Premack: My husband has
children from a previous marriage, and I have one daughter. We both have
Wills designating each other as beneficiaries, and my daughter as the
person to receive all our worldly possessions when we are both gone. Is it
necessary to state specifically that we don't want to leave anything to my
husband’s children? What if his children protest our Wills? Do they have a
legal claim? – G.C. via Email His children have a legal right to
challenge any Will he creates if they have adequate legal grounds. A Will
can be ruled invalid for a variety of reasons.
The most common complaint is that the testator (the person who made
Will) lacked testamentary capacity on the date the Will was signed. Before
anyone can make a valid Will, testamentary capacity is required. It means
the person (1) understood the business in which he was
engaged (the making of his Will); (2) understood the effect of the Will;
(3) understood the general nature and extent of his assets; and (4) knew
the natural objects of his bounty (that is, who his children were).
A Will can also be ruled invalid if it is a forgery or a fraud, or if
it does not reflect the testator’s true wishes (but instead reflects the
desires of someone else who is putting undue pressure on the testator).
A case decided recently by Texas’ 13th Court of Appeals is a
great illustration. In the matter of the Estate of Flores, the husband
made a Will leaving his estate to his wife. If she was not alive, it was
to go to three of his children. He left a fourth child out entirely, and
that child contested the Will when Mr. Flores died.
He let fly with a laundry list of complaints: that the
Will was not executed with the formalities required by law, that it was a
forgery and had been altered, that his father had made a mistake when he
signed it, and that his father lacked testamentary capacity. The court
carefully examined each of these claims and dismissed the case for lack of
evidence.
A key complaint was son’s claim that being left out of the Will was a
mistake on his father’s part, and that the Will should thus be voided. The
court decided that failure to identify the existence of a child may be a
mistake, but it has no bearing on the fact that the testator intended to
leave nothing to that child. In other words, it is not a legal requirement
that all the children be identified, nor that a child be explicitly
disinherited. It is legally sufficient to simply make a positive statement
identifying your heirs, and anyone who is off the list gets nothing.
But sometimes winning is not enough; avoiding the battle is even
better. You should carefully plan now to avoid a Will contest. Your
attorney should keep notes that establish your testamentary capacity. Your
Will should specifically identify and disinherit anyone you desire to
exclude. And your Will should contain a no-contest clause that says anyone
who contests your Will is not entitled to any inheritance. That level of
clarity will make it very difficult for anyone to claim you forgot about
them. |